This page provides high-level, non-algorithmic descriptions of the VisualAcoustic™ platform and its physics-anchored cognitive framework. All underlying algorithms, thresholds, data structures, and execution logic and related modules are defined exclusively in Phocoustic’s U.S. and international patent filings. Nothing here should be interpreted as an enabling disclosure, limitation of claim scope, or detailed specification.
The VisualAcoustic Semantic Drift Engine (VASDE) brings together physics-anchored sensing, structured drift representation, and evidence-qualified semantic interpretation. The descriptions below are conceptual only and are not intended to reveal internal methods.
Phocoustic is pioneering a new class
of sensing intelligence built on physics-anchored
drift analysis—a foundational shift away from statistical AI
toward systems that observe,
measure, and interpret real-world physical change with unprecedented
precision.
Traditional machine vision and AI systems rely on training data and
learned patterns.
Phocoustic solves the fundamental weaknesses of those
approaches—instability, hallucination, and domain fragility—by grounding
perception directly in measured,
repeatable physical invariants.
Our core engine, the VisualAcoustic Semantic Drift Engine (VASDE), operates across multimodal sensors (optical, acoustic, IR, structured light) to extract persistent physical drift, quantify its structure, and interpret what it means for material state, geometry, safety, and operational health.
Phocoustic systems do not rely on neural networks for detection.
They do not require
training data.
They do not
overwrite their internal reference models.
Instead, they produce deterministic,
stable, physics-compliant measurements that remain robust
across lighting, viewpoint, environmental variability, and domain
changes.
Phocoustic’s core breakthrough is the
ability to convert frame-to-frame physical microchanges—movement,
deformation, surface curvature, reflectance shifts, and pixel-level
structural perturbations—into a coherent semantic representation of what
is happening in a scene.
This representation is derived through a pipeline of drift validation, physical continuity checks, reference stability models, and quantized semantic structures.
1. Physics-anchored detection of real change
A deterministic method for identifying
only genuine, physically persistent changes in a scene.
This approach suppresses noise, glare, lighting fluctuations, and other
transient artifacts, ensuring that only real-world change is measured
and reported.
2. Dual reference inspection framework
A two-layer reference system that maintains:
a fixed, high-precision baseline used for strict inspection and validation
a safely adaptive reference that updates over time, but only when changes are physically verified
This structure prevents the failure mode common in adaptive vision systems where gradual defects are mistakenly absorbed into the reference and no longer detected.
3. Quantized representations of change
A compact and explainable encoding of
how change occurs, including its direction, strength, geometry, and
persistence over time.
These representations enable:
fast and consistent anomaly scoring
recursive zooming to localize defects precisely
traceable lineage from frame to frame for auditability
4. Structured-light based surface interpretation
A physics-driven method for analyzing
how structured light patterns deform across real surfaces.
This allows extremely fine detection of surface warpage, micro-cracks,
and subtle geometric deviations that are often invisible to conventional
image analysis.
5. Object-level change lineage tracking
A method for tracking how physical
change evolves on specific objects over time, rather than treating each
image independently.
This is critical for environments such as printed circuit board assembly
lines, conveyor systems, semiconductor wafers, and other sequential
industrial processes where history and progression matter.
Industries rely heavily on machine vision and deep learning, yet these technologies remain brittle:
Neural networks fail under fog, glare, vibration, and domain shift.
Adaptive statistical baselines absorb anomalies, masking early defects.
AI hallucinations and instability undermine trust in safety-critical environments.
Phocoustic solves these issues by basing every measurement on physics, not statistical guesses.
Zero hallucinations
Stable detection across conditions
Explainability down to the pixel-level drift vectors
Predictive insights from physical microchanges—before defects are visible
For manufacturing, automotive, robotics, defense, and inspection systems, this is a step-change in operational reliability.
Detect solder-joint instability, connector warpage, micro-cracks, wafer flatness variations, and CMP surface defects before they are visible to conventional systems.
Fog, smoke, glare, low light, and
high dynamic range environments degrade traditional AI.
Phocoustic’s drift-based geometry cues remain stable even when cameras
fail visually.
Predict mechanical drift, joint misalignment, slippage, cable stress, or vibration-induced instability in real time.
Track object-by-object drift lineage to detect:
defective units
contaminated products
deformed or missing components
production equipment faults
Monitor:
power electronics
connectors
aerospace components
precision optical assemblies
Through micro-drift signatures that indicate early failure.
Phocoustic’s patent portfolio now spans:
structured drift extraction
quantized drift semantics
physics-only admissibility frameworks
dual-reference architectures
structured-light recall
object-context lineage systems
physics-guided semantic development
This creates a tight moat around the physics-first paradigm.
Competitors relying on CNNs, optical flow, or statistical methods cannot
replicate the functionality without violating multiple patent layers.
Phocoustic has already demonstrated:
working real-time prototypes on machine-vision cameras
PCB micro-defect detection
wafer and connector drift analysis
fog/glare navigation stability
recursive zoom and drift-localization overlays
GUI systems capable of showing drift vectors, proprietary codes, and semantic flags
This is not a science experiment — it is a functioning platform.
Phocoustic is now ready for:
The groundwork — technical, patent, and prototype — is complete.
Phocoustic is establishing a new foundation for computer perception — one where systems derive meaning from measured physical reality, not from training data.
This approach unlocks:
safer AI
more reliable industrial automation
higher manufacturing yield
earlier defect prediction
robustness to environmental extremes
Phocoustic represents the beginning of physics-anchored semantic intelligence — the next major step beyond data-driven machine vision.
Rather than relying on statistical pattern recognition, the system is organized as a layered pipeline in which meaning emerges only from physically validated change.
Physical measurements are captured using optical sensors designed to preserve geometric, spectral, and illumination consistency across time.
↓
The system first identifies real,
persistent physical change.
Transient noise, glare, lighting variation, and sensor artifacts are
filtered out, ensuring that only changes consistent with physical
behavior are retained.
Temporal validation confirms that detected change is stable and causally
meaningful.
↓
Two complementary references are maintained simultaneously:
a fixed, high-precision baseline for strict inspection
a cautiously adaptive reference that updates only when changes are physically verified
This prevents slow defects from being absorbed into the reference and disappearing from detection.
↓
Validated physical change is encoded
into compact, explainable structures that capture direction, strength,
geometry, and persistence over time.
These structures support recursive zooming, precise localization, and
traceable evolution across frames.
↓
Structured change representations are
translated into interpretable, human-meaningful signals.
This layer governs how change is labeled, prioritized, and
contextualized without allowing unverified inference or hallucination.
↓
Meaning is not static.
The system models how semantics evolve over time based on repeated
exposure, environmental conditions, and physical recurrence — analogous
to developmental conditioning rather than retraining.
↓
Change is tracked at the level of
individual objects rather than isolated images.
This allows the system to understand how specific components, regions,
or surfaces evolve across time, enabling long-horizon reasoning in
industrial and scientific processes.
↓
At the highest level, an oversight
framework governs how semantic conclusions may influence decisions,
alerts, or actions.
This supervision ensures that any higher-level reasoning remains
physically grounded, explainable, and constrained by verified evidence.
The following videos illustrate capabilities and outcomes of the VisualAcoustic engine. They do not reveal or imply any software, hardware, or algorithmic implementation.
Phocoustic Video Example
Phocoustic Video Example
Phocoustic Investor Demo
Industrial Demonstration
Advanced Conceptual Demonstration
Phosight™ Illustration
Static-to-Drift Example
PCB Illustration
Wafer-Level Illustration
While VisualAcoustic’s physics-anchored cognitive architecture is not biological, several conceptual analogies help illustrate why the system is structured in layered, stability-oriented stages. These comparisons are metaphors only, not functional equivalences, and they do not describe internal mechanisms.
In biology, early sensory layers reduce noise and highlight stable patterns. Similarly, VASDE’s drift-extraction stage (PASDE) emphasizes change that meets physics-anchored persistence and continuity criteria, as defined in the patent filings. The analogy is conceptual: PASDE is a classical algorithmic framework, not a biological model.
Biological perception tends to group consistent signals into coherent structures. In VASDE, drift lineage—described in CIP-10 through CIP-13— provides a high-level notion of continuity across frames. This helps contextualize change without disclosing the internal quantization, gating, or admissibility processes protected in the patents.
Cognitive systems reject contradictory information. In VisualAcoustic, semantic activation is governed by multi-layer consistency checks (e.g., SCVL, PACF), which ensure stability before higher-order interpretation. The specific thresholds and verification logic are part of the CIP filings and are not described here.
Human cognition selectively “admits” information once it is stable and coherent. The PACI layer uses a structured gating model—outlined at a high level in CIP-10 ACI—to determine when evidence is sufficiently qualified. This analogy does not disclose how PACI evaluates or activates meaning; those details remain patent-protected.
Executive function in humans integrates goals, context, and constraints. Analogously, concepts such as PEQ-AGI (Physics-Evidence-Qualified AGI) describe how VisualAcoustic constrains reasoning to operator intent and physics-validated evidence. Implementation specifics are described in the corresponding CIP filings, not here.
These conceptual parallels help illustrate the logic of the physics-anchored cognitive stack: layered filtering, consistency checks, contextualization, and controlled semantic activation. None of these descriptions disclose algorithms, thresholds, or internal structures; those remain within the confidential or published patent record.